Futurix 14:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC) In this case the label of the column should be changed rather than removing the licensing information, which e.g. Ojw 12:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC) It should be marked as too - the fact that it is open source does not say anything about the price. It is a Rams head and should be deleted as someone has put the gnu project icon in the table for a laugh, I will try but am at work and this isp is sometimes odd. What is the meaning of the bull's heads, and why don't I know? Is it common knowledge? Is it assumed I should know? Do these various programs cost a bull's head?
#Thumbsplus 10 forum windows
Picaview stopped working with Windows XP SP2 and ACD has no intentions of fixing it or continuing the package. There are some viewers out there that do it, but I haven't run into any that work as well as Picaview. It'd be great to list if any of these offer context-menu viewing, such as (the now-defunct) Picaview from ACDSystems. Andy Mabbett 11:02, 26 October 2005 (UTC) Done. :-D badmonkey 04:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Context menu viewing The images in the table on this page have blank alt text - please can someone replace it with something more meaningful? Thank you.
![thumbsplus 10 forum thumbsplus 10 forum](http://ipic.su/7yOmES.jpg)
Or should applications that can edit images also be removed, because they are image editors not image viewers? - Peter 15:57, 24 February 2006 (UTC) Alt text Most applications provide both image viewing and image organizing features. I don't think you can talk about any difference between the two application types.
![thumbsplus 10 forum thumbsplus 10 forum](https://www.photoinfos.com/Fotosoftware/ThumbsPlus/batchdrehen.jpg)
Surely storing information in a central database is something for an image organizer? Acdsee does this too. The amount of file formats supported? Both Acdsee and ThumbsPlus support around 100 file formats. Acdsee, for example, is called a photo manager by it's publisher. Almost all applications mentioned do more than viewing single or lists of files. At least in a way that specifies the applications in this list as being mere viewers. Again, two different things.- Ctachme 15:39, 26 August 2005 (UTC) Please explain the (huge) difference between an image organizer and an image viewer. The problem here is apparently the same as over at comparison of media players that treats a orgianzier the same as a player. However, since image organisers need to rapidly scroll through thousands of images, often, their support of image formats is not as through as image viewers. Image organisers organise your files and image viewers do nothing but view single or lists of images. There is a huge difference between the two. I know of at least 2 programs that are image organisers, not image viewers. Look at CDisplay, for example, "a sequential image viewing utility". Futurix 16:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC) It would be for viewing images inside the archives, without needing to extract them.
![thumbsplus 10 forum thumbsplus 10 forum](https://img.informer.com/p9/thumbsplus-v10.1-quick-conversion.png)
What's the point? This is comparison of image viewers, not universal-programs-for-doing-anything. It'd be especially nice to know which programs let you view inside RARs/CBRs/CBZs.
#Thumbsplus 10 forum zip
Should we add information about the ability to view images inside archives? I know ACDSee let's you see inside ZIP files at least. Why isn't lightroom included in the image organisers comparison?i use it to organise all my pictures and it is pretty simillar to picassa or acdsee when reffering to it's purpose
#Thumbsplus 10 forum how to
The article says that Shotwell works on Windows, but it only supports Linux, but I can't figure out how to edit it. 40 What is the policy for adding entries?.36 Why there is no PMView in comparison?.31 Why we haven't 'Stretch' feature at the 'View functions' column?.30 uploading and publishing to websites.27 Linux tools capable of editing EXIF orientation tags.22 Image copyright problem with Image:Bsd daemon.jpg.